Small non-explosive batteries need to be a thing

Discussion in 'Suggestions & Feedback' started by Mindlessmrawesome, Nov 3, 2018.

?

agree or no?

  1. Yes

    3 vote(s)
    75.0%
  2. No

    1 vote(s)
    25.0%
  1. Mindlessmrawesome

    Mindlessmrawesome Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2016
    Messages:
    73
    Likes Received:
    107
    So I always make my techs with segmented batteries that don't chain react all the way down the craft. I separate them with an anti-explosion wall as I call it, makes it so that taking an explosive shot doesn't ruin your day in the campaign when your shields are down. They are nice and fine and work well, but it wastes a lot of space that could be used for something else.

    Here's what I suggest: make some batteries that don't explode with enough damage to take out 1/3 the health of a GSO battery. This will make it so that 3 of them would have to explode in order to combust a GSO battery and cause a chain reaction. Their own health should be relatively strong so they don't chain react themselves as battery explosions can damage at least all the blocks around it. Maybe just make some special code that makes them very resistant to battery-explosion damage and in the lore coat them with some sort of anti-acid heat resistant stuff.

    As of right now, you have two options: waste space that could be used for batteries with anti-explosion walls or have chain-reacting batteries that destroy your tech in one fell swoop. I think a third could really benefit the game: sacrifice a bit of cash for some batteries that can act as anti-explosion walls.

     
    Soviet_Samuelson likes this.
  2. Mindlessmrawesome

    Mindlessmrawesome Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2016
    Messages:
    73
    Likes Received:
    107
    also: a nice touch would for them to have APs on all sides. That'd make them viable for non-susceptible multi-tech turret shafts. Also make them hold less battery power than a GSO battery to balance them out and make them more expensive. Idk what corp they'd be for, I am thinking hawkeye because their sole purpose is to be more durable batteries but idk...

     
    Soviet_Samuelson likes this.
  3. Dynamix

    Dynamix Do you want to have a GOOD time?

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2017
    Messages:
    289
    Likes Received:
    419
    You could use Venture baterries.Less harmful and same storage as GSO with the cost of less APs.

    Also,Hawkeye already has batteries,but I agree they need to be tougher to chain reactions.

     
    Soviet_Samuelson likes this.
  4. Potato

    Potato Tinkerer of Titäns

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2016
    Messages:
    1,044
    Likes Received:
    1,904
    IMO, I think having somewhat explosive batteries make up for the fact that they're used for shielding. It prevents Techs that look like rolling battery bricks with guns on them. You just have to build smart, I suppose. :)

     
    DrShadox likes this.
  5. Mindlessmrawesome

    Mindlessmrawesome Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2016
    Messages:
    73
    Likes Received:
    107
    Do you think I haven't tried that? They chain react too! There are no batteries in the game right now that don't chain react.

     
  6. Mindlessmrawesome

    Mindlessmrawesome Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2016
    Messages:
    73
    Likes Received:
    107
    Here's my problem with that: there aren't any good armor blocks that can stand up to large amounts of firepower. If it was a question of armor or batteries, then yes I would say that all batteries should chain react as a balance for using them instead of just pure armor. But there isn't any armor that won't get blasted into oblivion by a couple shots from a battleship cannon. It's shields or nothing. You could go along the route of only repair bubbles, but they are only really useful on planes and techs that are quick enough to avoid big cannons. For big techs it is batteries or nothing, and no matter how smart you get with your designing you are always going to lose quite a significant amount of your battery storage for anti-chain reacting.

     
  7. QuackDuck

    QuackDuck Duck

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2017
    Messages:
    1,662
    Likes Received:
    3,458
    I do think this idea has potential, but I'm worried that this might make battery bricks even worse. Currently, battery bricks are only easily defeated by explosives, since their batteries are explosive as well. If this block were implemented, we could start seeing battery bricks made entirely out of these which would be immune to nearly everything except melee.

     
  8. DrShadox

    DrShadox GeoCorp worker

    Joined:
    May 23, 2018
    Messages:
    281
    Likes Received:
    269
    To be honest i always use a GC battery instead of a GC block on my build (made by 75% of GC block ?) , so it mean my main tech have exactly 74 GC battery and 0 GC block (+ some GSO battery) , and even with that , i almost never blow up.

    So yeah, i think it's a builder's skill issue , not a battery issue.

     
    #8 DrShadox, Nov 5, 2018
    Last edited: Nov 5, 2018
  9. Soviet_Samuelson

    Soviet_Samuelson Living in my pizza boxes because mom kicked me out

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2018
    Messages:
    1,025
    Likes Received:
    699
    Do this with hawkeye and Venture. Venture sacrifices battery storage, and hawkeye sacrifices lightweight-ness

     
    harpo99999 likes this.

Share This Page